American university can completely eliminate the risks posed by the national security law to Chinese-related courses, because these risks are essentially derived from the national security law imposed by the Chinese government, and The Chinese government is eager to extend the law's effect beyond its borders. DW: You did a research survey a few years ago, which showed that scholars who teach Chinese-related courses often have to face the challenges or risks of teaching sensitive topics on their own. What do you think higher education institutions can do to ensure they have adequate support for their academics? Qian Xina:
Our research survey shows that when scholars telemarketing list who study China issues encounter challenges or repression in the process, they usually deal with these situations by themselves, with little assistance from the schools or higher education institutions they serve. I think universities need to take a careful and comprehensive look at their collaborations, research programs, exchange programs, or fundraising activities with China, and use these activities to develop a coping strategy that is consistent with basic academic principles.
They should gather relevant information and make sure that both the school and the academics are aware of each other's current China-related activities or courses. In addition, schools and scholars should make good use of each other's advantages to identify potential risks and try to control them. Universities should discuss the risks they may face with academics focusing on China-related research to ensure that these academics do not encounter too many obstacles in doing their research.